The prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Fr. Joe Holzhauser, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance led by Senate pages Kaelyn Somsen and Denim Varland.
Roll Call: All members present except Sen. Otten who was excused.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Secretary of the
Senate has had under consideration the Senate Journal of the seventeenth day.
All errors, typographical or otherwise, are duly marked in the temporary journal for
correction.
And we hereby move the adoption of the report.
Dear Mr. President and Members of the Senate,
I respectfully return to you Senate Bill 14, with my VETO.
Senate Bill 14 is an Act to define solar energy facilities and to establish certain provisions
regarding solar energy permits.
This bill creates unacceptable ambiguity and confusion over the Public Utilities Commission's
authority. Even though the Legislature has expressly prohibited the Commission from
mandating the specific location of an energy facility, as we conducted a detailed legal review
of the enrolled bill, it became apparent poor drafting in this bill gives the Commission that
authority for solar energy projects. Previous legislative changes in 2005 and 2006 added
definitions of wind energy facility and AC/DC conversion facility to SDCL 49-41B-36,
avoiding this ambiguity. The commission should not be in the business of picking locations for
solar projects, but the enrolled version of this bill permits it. I do not believe this was the
Legislature's intent.
I also question the need for additional PUC regulation of solar generating stations. These
facilities are already covered under the more generic definition of an energy conversion
facility, in the Code. I am very concerned by a number of bills this session that increase state
regulation of renewable energy projects without appearing to have a tailored connection to
protecting public interest. The renewable energy industry, just as any other, should be subject
to only as much regulation as is necessary to promote the public interest and preserve our
environment while making South Dakota an attractive place to do business.
Senate Bill 14, as well as several other Commission-authored bills regulating the renewable
energy industry, were introduced without meaningful consultation with industry or other
opportunity for comment ahead of time. I believe strongly government's exercise of regulatory
power must be transparent and subject to meaningful debate. Our focus should be on finding
common ground between regulators and industry, making for stronger outcomes and preserving
our state's reputation as a premier place to do business. There is no reason why the
Commission couldn't work with industry and other stakeholders to find a compromise solution
to this issue and others.
As a state, we have been blessed with significant wind and solar resources. We should continue
to benefit greatly from billions of dollars in completed and planned investments. The renewable
energy industry has already invested heavily in South Dakota, and continued investment
depends on common sense, transparent, and customized regulation. I do not believe Senate Bill
14 or the process that led to its introduction meets these basic standards.
Mr. President and Members of the Senate:
I have the honor to inform you that on February 5, 2019, I approved Senate Bills 5, 11,
20, 21, and 35, and the same have been deposited in the office of the Secretary of State.
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 107 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass.
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 67 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
" Section 1. That § 26-8C-7 be amended to read:
26-8C-7. If a child has been adjudicated as a delinquent child, the court shall enter a decree
of disposition according to the least restrictive alternative available in keeping with the best
interests of the child. The decree shall contain one or more of the following:
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB 1046 and returns
the same with the recommendation that said bill be referred to the Senate Committee on
Appropriations.
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SCR 7 and returns the same with the recommendation that said resolution be amended as
follows:
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 185 which was tabled.
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 144 and 150 which were deferred to the 41st Legislative Day.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 92 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on the
consent calendar.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SJR 2 and returns the same with the recommendation that said resolution be amended as
follows:
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 91 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SJR 3 and SB 108 and 109 which were deferred to the 41st Legislative Day.
The Committee on Retirement Laws respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1010 and 1011 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills
do pass.
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Retirement Laws respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1045 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on
the consent calendar.
Also MR. PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Retirement Laws respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 42 which was tabled.
The Committee on Transportation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 117 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
The Committee on Local Government respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1020 and 1052 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills
do pass and be placed on the consent calendar.
The Committee on Local Government respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration SB 103 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended
as follows:
" Section 1. That § 4-7-31 be amended to read:
4-7-31. There is hereby established within the state treasury the budget reserve fund.
Expenditures from the budget reserve fund may occur only by special appropriation of the
Legislature and only to redress unforeseen expenditure obligations or unforeseen revenue
shortfalls, as may constitute an emergency pursuant to S.D. Const., Art. III, § 1.
Section 2. That § 4-7-32 be amended to read:
4-7-32. On July first of each fiscal year, or at such time that as the prior fiscal year general
fund ending unobligated cash balance is determined, the commissioner of the Bureau of Finance
and Management shall transfer all prior year unobligated cash up to an amount equal to ten
percent of the general fund appropriations from the general appropriation act for the prior fiscal
year into the budget reserve fund. In no event shall the cash balance in the budget reserve fund
be greater than ten percent of the general fund appropriations from the general appropriation
act for the prior fiscal year.
4-7-39. The commissioner of the Bureau of Finance and Management shall transfer any
unobligated cash remaining after the transfer into the budget reserve fund as required by § 4-7-32 into the general revenue replacement fund if the amount in the general revenue replacement
fund does not exceed fifteen percent of the general fund appropriations in the General
Appropriations Act for the previous fiscal year. "
The Committee on Taxation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 4
and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
" Section 1. That the code be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Office of Engrossing
and Enrolling has carefully compared SB 10 and 25 and finds the same correctly enrolled.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that SB 12, 23, 30, and 31
were delivered to her Excellency, the Governor, for her approval at 9:35 a.m., February 6, 2019.
I have the honor to transmit herewith SB 10 and 25 which have passed the House without
change.
I have the honor to transmit herewith HB 1022, 1035, 1055, 1059, 1068, 1072, 1076, 1077,
1092, 1110, 1124, and 1159 which have passed the House and your favorable consideration is
respectfully requested.
The President declared that SB 81, 82, and 83 were withdrawn at the request of the prime
sponsor pursuant to Joint Rule 6B-1.1.
HB 1022: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions regarding the
limitations on indemnification by the state.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Energy.
HB 1035: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to rename the unemployment insurance
program to the reemployment assistance program.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Energy.
HB 1055: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to require parental notification and
agreement before the institution of an order to withhold resuscitation from certain patients.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services.
HB 1059: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions regarding
vehicle dealer licensing.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation.
HB 1072: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to correct a definition in the Uniform
Unsworn Domestic Declarations Act.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxation.
HB 1076: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain real estate licensee
advertising restrictions and grant rule-making authority regarding real estate teams.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxation.
HB 1077: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise provisions regarding designation
of a no maintenance highway.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation.
HB 1092: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions regarding
campaign finance disclosure reports.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxation.
HB 1110: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to establish a penalty for certain persons
who fail to file a birth certificate or who fail to provide the notice required for the filing of a
death certificate.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
HB 1124: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to require health care facilities that perform
mammography to inform mammography patients on breast density.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Agriculture and Natural
Resources.
SB 154: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to authorize the production and transport of
saltwater crustaceans.
SB 63: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to increase the penalty for a subsequent
conviction for trespass to hunt, fish, or trap.
SB 54: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to regulate the use of care and maintenance
funds by perpetual care cemeteries.
HB 1024: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to authorize certain species of game fish to
be used as bait.
The question being Shall SB 154, 63, and 54 and HB 1024 pass as amended?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Cronin; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Foster; Greenfield (Brock); Jensen
(Phil); Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup;
Partridge; Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton;
White; Wiik; Wismer; Youngberg
Excused:
Heinert; Otten (Ernie)
So the bills having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bills passed and the titles were agreed to.
SB 61: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to provide certain provisions regarding nursing
facility closures.
Was read the second time.
The question being Shall SB 61 pass as amended?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Cronin; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Foster; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert;
Jensen (Phil); Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup;
Partridge; Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton;
White; Wiik; Wismer; Youngberg
Excused:
Otten (Ernie)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 55: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to allow the national motto of the United States
to be displayed in public schools.
Was read the second time.
"
Which motion failed.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 27, Nays 7, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Greenfield (Brock); Jensen (Phil); Klumb;
Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Novstrup; Partridge; Rusch; Russell; Smith (VJ);
Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton; White; Wiik; Youngberg
Nays:
Cronin; Foster; Heinert; Kennedy; Nesiba; Schoenbeck; Wismer
Excused:
Otten (Ernie)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Was read the second time.
The question being Shall SB 99 pass?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Cronin; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Foster; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert;
Jensen (Phil); Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup;
Partridge; Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton;
White; Wiik; Wismer; Youngberg
Excused:
Otten (Ernie)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 84: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to authorize the possession and administration
of opioid antagonists by school district and nonpublic school personnel.
"
Which motion prevailed.
The question being Shall SB 84 pass as amended?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Cronin; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert; Jensen
(Phil); Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup;
Partridge; Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton;
White; Wiik; Wismer; Youngberg
Excused:
Foster; Otten (Ernie)
SB 136: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to provide for the utilization of telehealth by
a health care professional.
Was read the second time.
" Section 9. That the code be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
Which motion prevailed.
The question being Shall SB 136 pass as amended?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 32, Nays 1, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Cammack; Cronin; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert; Jensen (Phil);
Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup; Partridge;
Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton; White;
Wiik; Wismer; Youngberg
Nays:
Bolin
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 137: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to provide for the payment of claims for
covered services provided by a health care professional via telehealth.
Was read the second time.
The question being Shall SB 137 pass as amended?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 29, Nays 4, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Cronin; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert; Kennedy;
Klumb; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nesiba; Novstrup; Partridge; Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck;
Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Sutton; White; Wiik; Wismer; Youngberg
Nays:
Jensen (Phil); Kolbeck; Nelson; Steinhauer
Excused:
Foster; Otten (Ernie)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 73: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise qualifications for sanitary district
trustees.
Was read the second time.
The question being Shall SB 73 pass?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 32, Nays 0, Excused 3, Absent 0
Excused:
Foster; Otten (Ernie); Youngberg
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 56: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provision regarding the
regulation of fireworks.
Was read the second time.
" Section 1. That § 34-37-1 be amended to read:
34-37-1. Terms used in this chapter mean:
34-37-2. No A person may sell, hold for sale, or offer is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor
if the person sells, holds for sale, or offers for sale, as wholesaler or retailer, any fireworks in
this state unless such person has first obtained without a license as a wholesaler or retailer
issued under this chapter.
Section 3. That § 34-37-2.1 be amended to read:
34-37-2.1. No A person under the age of eighteen years shall may not be licensed under this
chapter and no licensee shall. A wholesaler or retailer may not employ or permit any individual
person under the age of eighteen to sell, dispense, or offer for sale, within the State of South
Dakota any permissible fireworks enumerated in this chapter.
Section 4. That § 34-37-2.2 be amended to read:
Section 5. That § 34-37-4 be amended to read:
34-37-4. Except as provided in § 34-37-12, no a person shall possess, sell, offer for sale,
bring into this state, or discharge is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor if the person possesses,
sells, offers for sale, brings into this state, or uses any pyrotechnics commonly known as
fireworks, other than permissible consumer fireworks.
Section 6. That § 34-37-6 be amended to read:
34-37-6. Before any additional permissible fireworks not enumerated in under § 34-37-5
may be sold, held for sale, or offered for sale in this state, they the licensee shall be submitted
submit the fireworks to the Department of Public Safety for examination to determine their
compliance. For any fireworks submitted under this section that comply with 16 C.F.R. Title
16, Commercial Practices, Part 1507, effective January 1, 1998 2019, and the American
Pyrotechnics Association Inc., Standard 87-1, 1993 2001 edition, the department shall authorize
the fireworks for sale in this state.
Section 7. That § 34-37-8 be amended to read:
34-37-8. No A person who is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor if the person is not licensed
as a wholesaler or retailer shall bring and transports any fireworks into this state. No for sale.
A retailer shall may not sell any fireworks which that have not been purchased from a
wholesaler licensed under the provisions of this chapter.
Section 8. That § 34-37-10 be amended to read:
Section 9. That § 34-37-10.1 be amended to read:
34-37-10.1. No retailer shall sell A person is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor if the person
sells any fireworks from any a motor vehicle.
Section 10. That § 34-37-10.2 be amended to read:
34-37-10.2. If the general public occupies a structure where fireworks are being displayed
or sold, two or more approved exits shall be provided. If the general public does not occupy a
the structure that displays or sells fireworks, one or more approved exits shall be provided. A
violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.
Section 11. That § 34-37-10.3 be amended to read:
34-37-10.3. Signs must be prominently posted on all displays of fireworks offered for sale
at retail, which shall read At any location where consumer fireworks are being offered for sale,
the licensee shall prominently post a sign in red letters not less than three inches in height that
reads, "NO SMOKING WITHIN TWENTY-FIVE FIFTY FEET." A person is guilty of a Class
2 misdemeanor if the person smokes within fifty feet of a location under this section.
Section 12. That § 34-37-10.4 be amended to read:
34-37-10.4. In all buildings or structures wherein At any location where consumer fireworks
are being offered for sale the licensee shall have a sign prominently posted stating prominently
post a sign that states no fireworks can may be ignited or discharged used within one hundred
fifty three hundred feet of the licensee's premises. A person is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor
if the person ignites or uses any fireworks within three hundred feet of a location under this
section.
Section 13. That § 34-37-10.5 be amended to read:
34-37-10.5. No licensee may have on the premises A person is guilty of a Class 2
misdemeanor if the person has any device, apparatus, receptacle, or burner from which an open
flame is emitted. Each on the premises of a retail licensee. A retailer licensee shall in the
conduct of the business of selling fireworks keep and maintain upon the retailer's premises a fire
extinguisher bearing a rated capacity of at least 2-A.
Section 14. That § 34-37-11 be amended to read:
34-37-11. No person may sell or cause to be sold, discharge use, or cause to be discharged
used, any pyrotechnics of any description or any consumer fireworks within the exterior
boundaries of the Black Hills Forest Fire Protection District, and no.
Section 15. That § 34-37-12 be amended to read:
34-37-12. Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit licensed wholesalers or manufacturers
prohibits a wholesaler licensee or manufacturer from storing, selling, shipping, or otherwise
transporting, permissible fireworks to any person or entity outside of the State of South Dakota
if the sale and transportation are this state, consistent with 18 U.S.C. § 836, effective on January
1, 1983. The 2019. Any delivery of such fireworks shall only may be made by a properly
certified motor carrier as specified in chapter 49-28 or by licensed fireworks wholesalers or
manufacturers in a vehicle owned or leased by a wholesaler licensee, manufacturer, or fireworks
permit holders in vehicles owned or leased by them holder.
Section 16. That § 34-37-12.1 be amended to read:
Section 17. That § 34-37-13 be amended to read:
34-37-13. Nothing in this chapter prohibits the use of public display of display fireworks
at a public or private event. However, any person, association, organization, municipality,
county, firm, partnership, or corporation, before making such public display of A person using
display fireworks at a public or private event shall secure obtain a written permit from the
governing board body of the municipality, township, or county where the public display is to
be fired, and shall have purchased fireworks for the display from a licensed wholesaler under
this chapter. Any public display fireworks are to be used. Display fireworks may only be
purchased from a wholesaler licensee. Use of display fireworks at a public or private event shall
comply with the National Fire Protection Association Standard 1123, 1995 2018 edition.
Section 18. That chapter 34-37 be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
Section 19. That § 34-37-15 be amended to read:
34-37-15. If a person For any licensee who is found guilty of violating any of the provisions
of a second or subsequent violation under this chapter a subsequent time, such violation may
constitute cause for revocation or suspension of the license held by that person and for refusal,
the department may revoke or suspend the license and refuse to renew the license upon its
expiration thereof.
Section 20. That § 34-37-16 be amended to read:
34-37-16. No A person shall possess is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor if the person
possesses any fireworks, other than those enumerated in § 34-37-5. If any person shall have in
his possession possesses any fireworks in violation of said section § 34-37-5, a warrant may be
issued for the seizure of such the fireworks, and such. Any fireworks seized under this section
shall be safely kept stored to be used as evidence.
Section 21. That § 34-37-16.1 be amended to read:
34-37-16.1. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, it is unlawful for a person to
discharge fireworks in this state a person is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor if the person uses
consumer fireworks except during the period beginning from June twenty-seventh and
extending through the end of to the first Sunday after July fourth, and during the period
beginning December twenty-eighth and extending through to January first. A violation of this
section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.
Section 22. That § 34-37-16.2 be amended to read:
34-37-16.2. The provisions of § 34-37-16.1 §§ 34-37-2 and 34-37-16.1 do not apply to
snakes and smoke:
34-37-17. The Department of Public Safety, together with all any law enforcement officers
agency of the state and its or any political subdivisions, shall be charged with the enforcement
of the provisions of subdivision of the state, shall enforce this chapter.
Section 24. That § 34-37-5 be repealed.
34-37-5. Permissible fireworks are consumer fireworks as enumerated in Chapter 3 of the
American Pyrotechnics Association Inc., Standard 87-1, 1993 edition and that comply with
labeling regulations promulgated by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (C.F.R.
Title 16--Commercial Practices Part 1507), effective January 1, 1998.
Section 25. That § 34-37-10.6 be repealed.
34-37-10.6. For the purposes of this chapter, an approved exit is a continuous and
unobstructed means of egress to a public way. Exit doors shall be of the pivoted or side-hinged
swinging type and shall swing in the direction of exit travel. Exit doors shall be openable from
the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort.
Section 26. That § 34-37-14 be repealed.
34-37-14. Except where a punishment is specifically provided, a violation of the provisions
of this chapter is a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being Shall SB 56 pass as amended?
And the roll being called:
Yeas 31, Nays 0, Excused 4, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert; Jensen (Phil);
Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup; Partridge;
Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton; White;
Wiik; Wismer
Excused:
Cronin; Foster; Otten (Ernie); Youngberg
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed.
The question being on the title.
Which motion prevailed and the title was so amended.
HB 1033: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise provisions regarding transaction
of business by trust companies.
Was read the second time.
The question being Shall HB 1033 pass?
Yeas 30, Nays 1, Excused 4, Absent 0
Yeas:
Blare; Bolin; Cammack; Curd; DiSanto; Ewing; Greenfield (Brock); Heinert; Jensen (Phil);
Kennedy; Klumb; Kolbeck; Langer; Maher; Monroe; Nelson; Nesiba; Novstrup; Partridge;
Rusch; Russell; Schoenbeck; Smith (VJ); Soholt; Solano; Stalzer; Steinhauer; Sutton; White;
Wiik
Nays:
Wismer
Excused:
Cronin; Foster; Otten (Ernie); Youngberg
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
There being no objection, the Senate reverted to Order of Business No. 10.
The President declared that SB 111 was withdrawn at the request of the prime sponsor
pursuant to Joint Rule 6B-1.1.
The President publicly read the title to
SB 10: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to update references to certain federal motor
carrier regulations.
SB 25: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise the authority of Department of
Revenue special agents.
HB 1037: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to authorize the Board of Regents to
contract for the construction of a regional sports complex at Northern State University and to
make an appropriation therefor.
And signed the same in the presence of the Senate.